Prediction of Emerson Jones [273rd] vs Maddison Inglis [132nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
L W L W W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Jones 2 - 1 Inglis
They have played 7 sets in total, with Jones winning 4 and Inglis winning 3. The last match between Jones and Inglis was at the W75 Brisbane, 31-01-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Emerson Jones getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emerson Jones | 2 |
| Maddison Inglis | 1 |
| Jones | Stats | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (8-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 273 | Ranking | 132 |
| 252 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 16 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 9 |
| 61% (40-26) | Career Total W/L | 60% (293-197) |
| $15,170 | Career Prize Money | $460,080 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Emerson Jones
Player
Maddison Inglis
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Maddison Inglis
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
49%
(
48 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emerson Jones
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 37 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:41:44 | Average Match Time | 1:41:44 |
| 68% (149/219) | 1st Serve % | 66% (133/201) |
| 59% (88/149) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (91/133) |
| 39% (27/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (27/68) |
| 38% (9/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (13/28) |
| 41% (83/201) | Return Points Win % | 47% (104/219) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emerson Jones vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jones 2 - 1 Inglis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jones has won 38.5% of points on their second serve, while Inglis has won 41.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jones, in recent form, has won 50.18% of their opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 46.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.25% and 30.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jones has saved 45.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 47.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jones has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 21/ 11), with Inglis winning 65.79% (W/L 50/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jones has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 235/ 146), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jones has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 20/ 9), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.49% of matches (W/L 41/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Jones winning 2 times and Inglis being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Jones winning 4 and Inglis winning 3. The last match between Jones and Inglis was at the W75 Brisbane, 31-01-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Emerson Jones getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jones and Inglis have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jones winning 1 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jones winning 1, and Inglis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jones has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.25 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 272.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jones has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jones has converted 35.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 34.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Emerson Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hayu Kinoshita
Player
Emerson Jones
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Emerson Jones
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
En Shuo Liang
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve %
44%
(
12 of
27)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25
Total Points Won
16
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Honoka Kobayashi
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Emerson Jones
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Emerson Jones
65%
(
85 of
130)
1st Serve %
73%
(
81 of
111)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Maddison Inglis
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Jennifer Jackson
41%
(
26 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
77 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Jones vs Inglis?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jones Vs Inglis is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (40/26) | Win/Loss | 60% (293/197) |
| 59% (88/62) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (656/469) |
| 54% (750/641) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5449/4762) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 66 | Aces Total | 739 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 208 | Total Double Faults | 1305 |
| 1:20:38 | Average Match Time | 1:28:10 |
| 232.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.94 |
| 67% (2605/3916) | 1st Serve % | 65% (18158/27741) |
| 61% (1601/2605) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11374/18158) |
| 46% (605/1311) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4469/9583) |
| 47% (247/525) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1670/3487) |
| 47% (1862/3955) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12939/28697) |
| 59% (38/64) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (289/479) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (62/95) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (80/152) |
| 83% (40/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (289/247) |
| 15% (40/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (289/42) |
| 23% (26/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (201/46) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
